For the record, as far as I know, Mark Chen has no affiliation with the
Berkman Center. Harvard is, after all, an awfully big place!
Ben Edelman
Berkman Center for Internet and Society
Harvard Law School
!Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> I keep getting solicitation messages from ICANN cronies. Why? Anyway -
> this goes into my reply email file and i just felt like shareing. This
> will be replied to some time later as a public message. I hate ICANN
> solicitaions.
>
> I'm still waiting for my membership @Large - has anyone actually recieved
> an ICANN@Large membership for - correspondenc via snail mail - what's
> happening with that?
>
> Meanwhile, this ICANN fool mercenary from the Haravrd pansies over at
> Berkman is sending me spam, a private solicitation for input. For what -
> to waste my time. I've got correspondence backlogged - and ICANN is
> sending me junk like this.
>
> Normally - I don't care, but Ester - where's my ICANN@Large
> membership. Has anyone in these newsgroups gotten one? I have yet to
> hear that anyone has received an ICANN@Large membership. What's happening
> with that.
>
> And Ester - as you know I give ICANN my undivided attention, I rather have
> my membership card instead of putting up getting this gibberish which is
> only asking me to contribute to the ICANN nonsense. The world hates you
> and your delays are losing me real opportunity. I wanted to incorporate
> this years theme of ICANN - Chile Porn - Yakohama on the table to the at
> large membership. I think it's time to put in some balance to the current
> clowns who are on the board - don't you dear ;-)
>
> For the record Ester - I've made my position on the issue very clear, in
> the Support In Opposition To The New TLD Sunrise Clause submitted by
> Mr. Sexton and Dr. Berryhill you will note I endorsed that document.
>
> The only thing I want to do is provide you with notice that the tld .god
> will be active this year and it's charter will defining the tld as
> property. So get your act together ester - it's time for Yokohama ;-)
>
> Cheers
> Joe Baptista
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 01:06:08 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Mark Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Joseph Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: ICANN Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal
>
> Dear Mr. Baptista:
>
> As you probably know, the Names Council of ICANN is considering a
> "Sunrise Plus Twenty" proposal that would give right of first refusal to
> all trademark and servicemark holders in new top-level domains.
>
> The Names Council is accepting public e-mail comments on the issue until
> May 10 and may use these comments in making recommendations to the ICANN
> board. Both the "Sunrise Plus Twenty" proposal and relevant e-mail
> comments can be found at http://www.icann.org/dnso/wgb-report-17apr00.htm
>
> Most of the e-mail comments to date have been from corporate
> trademark-holders that support the proposal. I would like to encourage you
> to voice your opposition to "Sunrise Plus Twenty" via e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and to inform others who might be inclined to do
> likewise. Thank you for your time.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mark A. Chen
>
>
>
