At 11:15 PM 5/11/00, Jay Fenello wrote: >FYI: > Sorry, Should have added that this intro was from icannwatch.org >ICANN's Latest Outrage > >Bret Fausett, a long-time ICANN observer, describes how ICANN kept its >plans to create a one-sided Nomination Committee secret. It was easy: >ICANN just violated its own by-laws. ICANNs (rather weak) transparency >rules require that minutes of secret Board meetings be published in 3 >weeks; ICANN gave itself just enough extra time to make sure no one knew >what was going on. So much for "transparency". > >The article also contrasts the secretive method of picking the NomCom with >the more open methods used previously; where was the Call for Participation? > >Mr. Fausett asks why it is that the group selecting candidates for the >At-Large is composed entirely of representatives of Board members and of >groups already well represented elsewhere in the ICANN structure -- and >has no representatives of users. > >http://www.lextext.com/21days.html > >Respectfully, > >Jay Fenello, >New Media Strategies >------------------------------------ >http://www.fenello.com 770-392-9480 >Aligning with Purpose(sm) ... for a Better World >------------------------------------------------ >"If we want to change the world, we have to >begin by changing ourselves" -- Deepak Chopra Respectfully, Jay Fenello, New Media Strategies ------------------------------------ http://www.fenello.com 770-392-9480 Aligning with Purpose(sm) ... for a Better World ------------------------------------------------ "If we want to change the world, we have to begin by changing ourselves" -- Deepak Chopra
