At 03:02 PM 7/15/00, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>Jay,
>
>Please explain what glitch there was in the SRS.  I don't believe your
>assessment in this regard is correct.
>
>Chuck


Hi Chuck,

I was referring to an exchange that occurred on one
of the IETF mailing lists, where at least one member
of the SRS advisory committee was complaining about
some design decisions that were made about the SRS
that were less than optimal.

If you'd like more details, then I'd suggest removing
them from their NDA, as they have requested.

Jay.


> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jay Fenello [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 2:10 AM
> > To:   Becky Burr; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Esther Dyson;
> > Mike Roberts; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:      [IFWP] Re: Very Different Stories
> >
> >
> >
> > FYI:
> >
> >
> > At 11:54 PM 7/13/00, [someone] wrote:
> > >Jay Fenello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,16642,00.html?nl=dnh
> > > >http://www.newsbytes.com/pubNews/00/151796.html
> > >
> > >Neither of these articles goes into detail on the pros or cons of
> > >ICANN's DNS management or plans.  Do you have any URLS to something
> > >more substantive?
> >
> >
> > Yes, please see Mikki Barry's Congressional
> > testimony below.
> >
> >
> > >Most of us domain owners see ICANN as a breath of fresh air after 5 years
> > >of monopolistic management, price gouging, anti-consumer privacy
> > policies,
> > >insecure data management, and direct email advertising (spam) by
> > >NSI/NetSol.
> >
> >
> > Well, others wonder why you would feel that way.
> >
> > Ironically and if anything, your domain name is
> > much less secure today than it was before ICANN
> > started messing with it.
> >
> > For example, we have just endured a wave of domain
> > name hijackings (i.e. Internet.com), and lost names
> > due to transfer glitches in the SRS (i.e. races.com).
> >
> > We have a registrar community that has discovered
> > "partnerships" with domain name brokers and auction
> > houses, and the last time I checked, every single
> > registrar had a clause that allowed them to
> > confiscate your domain name without recourse.
> >
> > Truth of the matter is, ICANN has made egregious
> > decisions in support of its agenda, resulting in
> > an organization heavily biased against small
> > businesses and individuals.
> >
> > Just look at the terms of the UDRP.  It heavily
> > favours the plaintiff, to the point of allowing
> > them to choose their jury, and only giving the
> > defendants a very short time to retain counsel
> > and respond.
> >
> > Or look at the bias in the DNSO, where famous
> > mark owners have pushed through a "Sunrise
> > Provision," whereby they get to preclude up to
> > 50 derivations of their mark in any new gTLD!
> >
> > What we are really seeing is an attempt to
> > control words on a world-wide basis, just as
> > we are seeing attempts to own genetic code,
> > business processes, etc.  But these are very
> > complicated times, as highlighted by the ever
> > present questions that surround Napster.
> >
> > While I don't have any answers, I do have many
> > questions -- and a belief that we must have open
> > and frank discussions about these issues if we
> > are to find any kind of lasting solution.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> >
> > Jay.
> >
> >
> > >Until someone presents a reason to question their management, other
> > >than the fact that we're all waiting for more top level domains, I say
> > >thank goodness for ICANN.
> > >
> > >[sig file]
> >
> >
> >  From the Congressional Record:
> >
> > http://com-notes.house.gov/cchear/hearings106.nsf/0ecf8a0be39f34228525671b
> > 0073d116/42eb7dbc7f008088852568a90072b057?OpenDocument
> >
> >
> >                   TESTIMONY OF MICHAELA M. BARRY
> >
> >      Ms. Barry. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
> >      I have to admit here that I am an attorney. Please make no
> > mistake about ICANN's role. It goes far beyond that of
> > technical management and enters into the realm of the
> > regulatory body. It is not just about plumbing, but it is also
> > about the codes and the licensing for that plumbing.
> >      ICANN's policy will affect commerce, freedom of expression,
> > and likely stifle the very medium it seeks to regulate. We
> > spent years fighting communism and its vision of planned
> > economies. Let us not let that vision happen to the Internet.
> > Competition is paramount, but not at the cost of free
> > expression, sacrificing small business, and individual
> > interests, and without accountability.
> >      ICANN is now trying to execute a policy agenda before it
> > has created the participatory structures that would allow its
> > decisions to be accepted and trusted by a broad spectrum of
> > stakeholders. ICANN does not now, nor has it ever had
> > legitimacy by consensus of the Internet community. ICANN is the
> > classic top-down organizational structure without
> > accountability. Most of the ordinary participant's in ICANN's
> > activities thought that they were participating in an
> > institution-building process. They thought that ICANN was a
> > level playing field where all competing groups could come
> > together to work out a consensus approach.
> >      They thought that they would have an opportunity to create
> > membership structures, representational mechanisms, and policy
> > development procedures first, and that actual policymaking
> > would happen second. These include imposition of dispute
> > policies from the World Intellectual Property Organization,
> > WIPO, which even the U.S. Small Business Administration says
> > are discriminatory.
> >
> > <BIG SNIP>  Please read the rest!!
> >
> >
> > Respectfully,
> >
> > Jay Fenello,
> > New Media Strategies
> > ------------------------------------
> > http://www.fenello.com  770-392-9480
> > Aligning with Purpose(sm) ... for a Better World
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > "If we want to change the world, we have to
> > begin by changing ourselves" -- Deepak Chopra
> >
> >


Respectfully,

Jay Fenello,
New Media Strategies
------------------------------------
http://www.fenello.com  770-392-9480
Aligning with Purpose(sm) ... for a Better World
-------------------------------------------------------
"We are witness to the emergence of an epic struggle
between corporate globalization and popular democracy."
http://cyberjournal.org/cj/korten/korten_feasta.shtml
    -- David Korten


Reply via email to