Lloyd Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Allen Simpson wrote:
>> The users of the Internet have access to several free browsers that
>> support frames on a dozen platforms. Folks that are unable to use
>> the Internet are not an appropriate electorate. Lazy kindergartners
>> are not the target audience for ICANN membership.
> I do hope this isn't the official ICANN view. I imagine that
> a disability discrimination lawsuit would soon follow.
> how many text-to-speech audio browsers support frames well?
Support for the disabled does seem to be a concern in some quarters;
for example, see
http://dir.yahoo.com/Computers_and_Internet/Software/Internet/World_Wide_Web/Browsers/Lynx/
The secure registration page requires https, which isn't available in lynx
as far as I know.
I am wondering if it might make sense going forward to allow an email
submission. Email is for the most part a queued delivery mechanism, so it
is not necessary for the user to resubmit an html form if the server is
busy.
--gregbo
