(fixed)

>Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 08:21:30 -0500
>From: "ooblick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Re: Why wake up? (Re: [IFWP] Is this list up? (Test, ignore, sorry))
>To: "Dan Steinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2001 12:18:55.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[EE94E8F0:01C13604]
>
>Hear hear.  So i am going on vacation.  The fix was in from the get go and all we 
>were was pawns to lend legitimacy to their fabricated claims of consensus.
>
>See you next week. I'm going diving.
>>---- Original Message ---
>>From: Dan Steinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Cc: 
>>Subject: Re: Why wake up? (Re: [IFWP] Is this list up? (Test, ignore, sorry))
>>
>>Well to counter your argument I would say that I went to IFWP meetings all over
>>the globe, went to an ICANN meeting or two.  I worked on the at-large issue in
>>good faith in the first Membership Advisory Committee.  I believe I was very awake
>>during the entire process, with gusts to diligent.  What did all that work get?
>>not much I think.  I am not funded to work on lost causes.  Those that go to
>>Montevideo are funded to act and more than a couple of them will have a pre-set
>>agenda. Unless you want to fund everyone on this list to show up and make a
>>presence felt, I think sleeping is the more economical course.
>>
>>Marc Schneiders wrote:
>>
>>> Why we should wake up fast? Quite a few people are on their way to
>>> Montevideo right now. A couple  of them may try to determine a lot of
>>> things on their own there without real input from those affected. The
>>> ALSC preliminary report leaves not much hope for a change to the
>>> better. Now, if it would be a good, thorough, well argued report, in
>>> whi
>
>
>
>

--
     "But at the end of the day, even if you put a calico dress on 
      it and call it Florence, a pig is still a pig."
      -- Bradshaw v. Unity Marine Corp. et al., 2001 U.S. Dist.
      LEXIS 8962, (S. D. Tex., 2001).

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]     [EMAIL PROTECTED]     [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to