As for ICANN finding out your plan, Stef, seems wise to presume that
your postings here have already been forwarded to ICANN by lurkers on
this list. There is no stealth on an open mailing list....
-- ken
>Well, we run some danger of you going to ICANN meetings and spilling
>our beans;-)...
>
>So, you will find some hostility here to people who insist on
>participating in both. We a re not going to try to kill ICANN, but
>we also do not want to put our head in the ICANN guillotine for no
>good purpose other then to lose our heads.
>
>We need to use some stealth in our effort to route around ICANN.
>We do not need to visibly thumb our noses at them, or parade by with
>a brass band to get their attention.
>
>It is hard to agree to ignore them and at the same time work with
>them in their faked up committees.
>
>So, I fear you are going to get you chance to choose paths.
>
>Cheers...\Stef
>
>
>At 00:11 +0200 11/09/01, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>>Is this true? Does it not depend on _how_ you work inside ICANN? I see
>>a lot of people active on the ncdnhc list who 'hate' ICANN as much as
>>possible. Still they vote for the ICANN board seat (maybe without
>>success) if they happen to be on the Names Council. Lets not ostracize
>>each other. I am not putting any money on ICANN. Still, I don't see
>>why I could not participate in some of its processes and at the same
>>time be part of 'alternatives'. I would rather see things in the
>>perspective of the wrong party being in power. Not the power being so
>>entagled in cosa nostra that all I can do is buy a gun and go into the
>>mountains.
>>Anyway, I live in a country that is flat.
