On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Michael Sondow wrote: > > > From: Karl Auerbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > My recourse is to either abandon my obligations as a Director or to > > > initiate such steps outside of the corporate boundaries as are > > > consistent > > > with my obligation of loyalty to the corporation. > > What steps, I wonder, does Karl have in mind? If he's thinking of legal
The real question is why Karl or anyone else would feel an obligation of loyalty to ICANN. Karl's obligations are those of any director of a California corporation. He is obliged to make sure that ICANN is acting in accordance with the law. If it isn't, he is obliged to take steps to bring the company's actions in accordance with the law. Now that we have gotten this far, how does this differ from what an obligation of loyalty to ICANN would call for? > measures, I'm afraid he isn't going to get very far. It should be -- Jim Dixon VBCnet GB / the Astra Group http://www.vbc.net tel +44 117 929 1316 fax +44 117 927 2015
