Yes, you are correct, and I don't know why any of the root zone operators would point to his AURSC or IRSC knowing this.
Seems like there should be encouragement to route around anyone who doesn't handle the responsibily ethically and professionally, but then comes the question abo9ut who decides this and how. >On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, at 08:04 [=GMT-0800], Ellen Rony wrote: > >> [Aside: .SHEESH still is a collider because Adam Todd REFUSES to make the >> simple redelegation change I have been requesting for 1.5 years. One >> excuse after another.] > >Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this just a matter of a root zone >operator refusing to change nameservers? Meaning SHEESH is not a >collider, but Todd a bad root zone operator. (I am friendly today.) > >-- >Marc Schneiders
