On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 13:44 -0400, Nathan Hamiel wrote: > Its also classified as a developing country. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developing_country > > > For someone who gets hung up on vetting and such you sure do refer to > Wikipedia a lot ;)
Yes because you can see the vetting process in full effect. If you question it, then change it, and if others question you, debate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Developing_country Its why they have talk pages. Also areas where they mark stuff as disputed, current events etc. Its a great resource because anyone can contribute, and anyone can challenge the contributions just the same. Also Wikipedia tends to be some what of an aggregator, they just pull information from else where. One can gather the same stuff on their own. Or just go to Wikipedia which likely someone gathered it there already. Most any opinion on there has a reference to back it up factually. If its something that needs a reference they will say it needs a citation. I would say of the social networking world. A live, world wide, encyclopedia is likely at the top of the value and useful list. -- William L. Thomson Jr. Obsidian-Studios, Inc. http://www.obsidian-studios.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive http://marc.info/?l=jaxlug-list&r=1&w=2 RSS Feed http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml Unsubscribe [email protected]
