This needs to be forked into a new thread. I would NEVER consider requesting my place of work to host a 2600 meeting. I value my job more than that.
JaxLUG on the other hand, is a different story. On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Mrdrjnkee <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with Mr. Potts- while the 2600 meetings should not be malicious, > they do cover questionable topics and the majority of those in attendance > would likely respond to a sign-in sheet with tinfoil hats. While I would > love for the meetings to get started back up, they are probably best at a > private venue. > > > The town center and airport would probably NOT be a good place to > practice. Being a public meeting, you never know who may show up, or who > any of these people really are. Aside from issues of ethics or legalities, > learning in an environment (where you also don't know WHO you may be > MITM'ing) is an excellent way to test the seriousness of the many > cyber-laws. In the wake of facebook handing over more than 30 activists to > the feds (some of whom are being deported), anonymous being revealed in a > mass roundup, and lulzsec losing their lulz-- the best bet is to all meet in > someone's garage, set up an AP or two, and pair up to work on things. Then, > do what you will. > > Going to jail for interstate telecommunications crimes would suck-- > especially if it's because you practiced on the wrong user. > > Just my 2 cents. For what it's worth, I'm a C|EH and vulnerability and > forensics researcher. I would love to meet like-minded souls with whom to > learn and speak with, but I will not be conducting any illegal activities. > > Hope to hear more about this and get something legitimate going. I have > a stack of Cisco firewalls, routers, switches, and various wireless routers. > > I > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive http://marc.info/?l=jaxlug-list&r=1&w=2 RSS Feed http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml Unsubscribe [email protected]
