Lol I understood. I was just giving my reason behind me thinking the same :)
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Chad Bailey <[email protected]>wrote: > Not sure you understood my response... We all know about this > behavior, it's intentional and has been talked about before. I'm > actually saying I support the idea to change it so that the default > reply-to address is the list, rather than the individual. Many others > also supported changing the style last time it was brought up. > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Joshua Gdovin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > To me the point of a mailing list in this manor is not to just pass out > > information but also to share ideas and knowledge between the group. > > > > Therefore replies to problems directly to the person who asked the > question > > is not better for the group to me. > > > > I hope that we can change this :) > > > > Thanks, > > Josh > > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Chad Bailey <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> This isn't the first time this has been brought up. The guy who was > >> against this isn't any longer a part of the LUG so maybe the consensus > >> has changed. I know I'd personally prefer this style to the current > >> behavior. > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Joshua Gdovin <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > can we modify the mailing list to have a reply-to: [email protected] ? > >> That > >> > was the community can see replys. Right now if I hit reply it goes to > the > >> > individual. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Josh > >> > > >> > > >
