On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 11:42:31AM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote: > Argh. Anyone who answered "Yes" to your question (correctly, mind you) would > immediately be committing a federal crime.
All assuming the company in question resides in the US, or has significant presence in the US. There is, of course, considerable strong-arming and informal co-operation going on behind the scenes, so geography is not exactly a good protection. I've personally given up on any commercial software, and moved to purely community-built tools, and will take considerable protection now that we know that Ft. Meade is in the business of hacking end users and companies. > Considering the consequences, no-one in their right mind would ever confirm > that they had been approached or received a NSL. > Which makes asking the question quite irrelevant. The question is useful, since it produced this thread. As I suggested, if you're not trusting pfSense, you can always manually verify the rules generated by it, and load it into a pf-speaking device you consider trustable. _______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
