Hello, First of all I have a Question.
Your booth Sites use overlapping Subnets. Is it a typing error? To come to you Routing Question. In future, are there more branch Offices scheduled? I think in this case a Dynamic Routing Protocol is perfekt (OSPF / BGP) In the other case the simplest solution is to use Static Routing. Regards Klaus Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 14.05.2014 um 06:17 schrieb "Faisal Gillani" <faisal.gill...@akesp.org>: > > Hello All > > I am trying to use Pfsense as my premier router to connect my office with > other branch offices on a provider's layer 3 MPLS network. > I have disabled all NAT and packet filtering on both of my Pfsense boxes. > Also uncheck block private schemes on my WAN interfaces as the ip schemes my > MPLS provider uses are private ones. > > Below is my scenario all I want is help what to define in my static routes > or should I use dynamic routing protocols for this ? > > IP Settings given by MPLS provider > > Site 1 > IP 10.152.8.130 > Subnet 255.255.255.252 > GW 10.152.8.129 > > Site 2 > IP 10.152.8.118 > Subnet 255.255.255.252 > GW 10.152.8.117 > > Local Network IP settings > > Site 1 > IP 172.16.0.0 > Subnet 255.255.0.0 > All clients in Site 1 use 172.16.1.16 (Pfsense) as its default gateway it is > also connected with MPLS network with above given settings > > Site 2 > IP 172.16.11.0 > Subnet 255.255.0.0 > All clients in Site 2 use 172.16.11.17 (Pfsense) as its default gateway it > is also connected with MPLS network with above given settings > > Requirement > > . Clients on both sites should be able to access each other. > . Clients on both the Sites should use 172.16.1.16 for their internet > needs > > Thanks > Faisal > > > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > List@lists.pfsense.org > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
