You might take a look in the cf/conf/config.xml .if it persists it should
originate from there. Just do a search for the IP.
12. juli 2014 05:04 skrev "Stefan Maerz" <
stefan.ma...@thecommunitypartnership.org> følgende:

> Thank you for the response Espen. This was actually the approach I took
> (flushing arp and reseting switches). It is a moot point now -- I came to
> the conclusion that I accidentally was spoofing the gateway interface using
> my Windows 7 MAC address.
>
> Darwin award winner? I think so. I misinterpreted "Insert my local MAC
> address" in the Interface Edit screen. I thought it meant local to the
> interface I was editing. Not so! Lesson learned! My poor network was as
> almost as confused as I was.
>
> However at this point I had not solved my original problem. I disabled my
> WAN interface just to see what would happen. This allowed me to ping my
> CentOS host. At that point it became clear to me that there was a routing
> issue -- taking down one interface causing another to start working seems
> like a "pecking order" issue to me. I had not checked the routing table
> before because the pfSense Wiki reads:
>
>> You do not need to add routes for networks which are directly connected
>> to any interface of the firewall, and doing so may cause problems. You only
>> need to define static routes for networks which cannot be reached via the
>> default gateway.
>>
> I made the incorrect assumption that this statement implied that somehow
> no superfluous routes would be added, or if they existed they would
> automatically be removed. However for some reason it was configured to
> forward 10.144.1.8 to my WAN interface.
>
> A quick route del -host 10.144.1.8 and my network is 100% functional.
>
> However, still one problem remains. The route del command is not
> persistent when I reboot. How do I get rid of it? System>Routing>Routes
> indicates that no static routes are set up. Is there a routing
> configuration file somewhere?
>
> Best Regards,
> -Stefan
>
> On 7/11/2014 6:35 PM, Espen Johansen wrote:
>
>>
>> Please provide a network drawing.
>> I suspect you have a arp leak or a switch that needs to be restarted to
>> clear its arp cache. Restart switche (s) without nothing connected and add
>> the cetos and pfsense only and only after you have cleared both units arp
>> cache (arp -d). Then take it from there.
>>
>> HTH.
>>
>> - LSF
>>
>> 11. juli 2014 21:57 skrev "Stefan Maerz" <stefan.maerz@
>> thecommunitypartnership.org <mailto:stefan.maerz@
>> thecommunitypartnership.org>> følgende:
>>
>>     On 7/11/2014 2:03 PM, Stefan Maerz wrote:
>>
>>         On 7/10/2014 7:52 PM, Stefan Maerz wrote:
>>
>>
>>             Hi everyone,
>>
>>             I have a problem I have been unable to solve all day
>>             (literally *all* day).
>>
>>             My pfSense box has two LAN interfaces and a WAN interface.
>>             A CentOS 7.0 server is giving me grief on one of the
>>             Subnets when configured as static or dynamic.
>>
>>             When I put the problematic CentOS box on the other subnet
>>             (and change corresponding host network configurations), it
>>             works. The CentOS box also works when I put it on my
>>             trustworthy Linksys WRT router (again, changing host
>>             network settings along the way). To me this smelled of a
>>             firewall problem, but there is nothing logged and I have
>>             both LAN interfaces set up to pass everything. Secondly I
>>             looked at DHCP for possible DHCP addressing conflicts, but
>>             the DHCP server is disabled on this subnet. TCPdump
>>             reveals that literally nothing is making it to the gateway
>>             interface, however at the same time the activity light on
>>             the interface blinks corresponding to my pings (there is
>>             no other traffic).
>>
>>             Further confusing me is that I am able to get a static IP
>>             from other devices when I plug them into the problematic
>>             subnet. Basically this single device does not work on this
>>             single subnet and that is the only problem. Other devices
>>             are fine on this subnet and this device is fine on other
>>             subnets. ...?
>>
>>             It is also worth noting that all the link lights are
>>             lighting up and the cables and switch have been tested to
>>             be working correctly. Nothing that I can see looks out of
>>             place in pfSense's logs.
>>
>>             Here are my host configuration files, all generated by
>>             CentOS's nmtui utility. I tried my own manual
>>             configurations with the same results (not
>>             working):http://pastebin.com/HFYYTG09(possible
>>             <http://pastebin.com/HFYYTG09%28possible> typos -- this is
>>             hand written, my apologies if that is the case)
>>
>>             I am at a loss and have been at this all day. pfSense has
>>             so little to configure that I'm not really sure what I
>>             could have done wrong. I feel like it is something really
>>             simple that I missed. Anyone have recommendations on how
>>             to troubleshoot?
>>
>>             Best Regards,
>>             -Stefan
>>
>>         Hello again,
>>
>>         I have been looking around. I found something interesting in
>>         my ARP table. For some reason my Windows 7 Admin workstation
>>         has two IP addresses assigned to it. Stranger yet is that one
>>         of the addresses a) is not on the correct subnet, and b) is
>>         the gateway address for the SRV subnet (the problematic subnet).
>>
>>         Additionally there is nothing in the problematic CentOS box's
>>         ARP table.
>>
>>         To me this would indicate that CentOS is trying to reach its
>>         gateway but pfSense is telling it that its gateway is on the
>>         wrong subnet (my Windows Admin Computer).
>>
>>         I unplugged everything from the SRV (problematic) subnet and
>>         unplugged the ADMINISTRATOR computer then manually flushed
>>         pfSense's ARP table (arp -da). This removes the 10.145.1.38
>>         entry, but the incorrect 10.144.1.1 entry is persistent.
>>
>>         How can I fix this? Is something misconfigured? Am I
>>         misunderstanding something? Is it a pfSense bug?
>>
>>         See pictures:
>>         https://db.tt/4Q6skpiF -- pfSense ARP table (some data sanitized)
>>         https://db.tt/coWT9GoB -- Settings on ADMINISTRATOR PC
>>
>>         I am greatly appreciative of any help.
>>
>>         Best Regards,
>>         -Stefan
>>
>>     I believe I have indeed confirmed something is indeed wrong with ARP.
>>
>>     Here is a TCP dump session from the pfSense Box*:
>>     http://pastebin.com/zyVpPkcD
>>
>>     As you can see it is looping through ARP. Line 6 is pointing my
>>     CentOS box at a MAC address on a separate subnet.
>>
>>     So I suppose my question is now, how do you troubleshoot ARP?
>>     Isn't it supposed to just work? What am I doing wrong?
>>
>>     I also have a remote site that could benefit from this knowledge*:
>>     https://db.tt/5xKvBZBb
>>
>>     Best Regards,
>>     -Stefan
>>
>>     *Data is sanitized
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     List mailing list
>>     List@lists.pfsense.org <mailto:List@lists.pfsense.org>
>>     https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> List mailing list
>> List@lists.pfsense.org
>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> List@lists.pfsense.org
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to