Ivo, that's a good idea....but please tell me if I'm correct or not:

WAN, LAN, Bridge interfaces: IP-Less
OPT1: IP for management in a management network

Tnaks again,

2014-09-30 9:27 GMT-03:00 Ivo Tonev <i...@tonev.pro.br>:
> I recommend you create a management network for OPT1 with private IP.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Roberto Carna <robertocarn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I think this is good for us:
>>
>>
>> - Router ISP with IP 200.0.0.1
>>
>> - pFsense with the following interfaces:
>>
>>   a) WAN IP-Less
>>   b) LAN IP-Less
>>   c) OPT1 with IP 200.0.0.2 (management)
>>   d) Bridge with WAN and LAN interfaces, and Bridge interface IP-Less
>>
>> - Corporate firewall with IP 200.0.0.3
>>
>> - Snort runs in Bridge interface
>>
>> Do you think this is correct ???
>>
>> Good night !!!
>>
>> Roberto
>>
>>
>> 2014-09-29 22:09 GMT-03:00 Jeronimo L. Cabral <jelocab...@gmail.com>:
>> > I can say that I imagine this addresses space:
>> >
>> > Router / IP 200.1.1.1 --- WAN IP-Less / pFsense/ LAN IP-Less ---
>> > Firewall /
>> > IP 200.1.1.2
>> >                                                            OPT1 / IP
>> > 200.1.1.3
>> >                                                             (management)
>> >
>> > So, the WAN and LAN interfaces from pFsense are IP-LESS (promiscuos
>> > mode),
>> > and the OPT1 interface from pFsense has a public IP as router and
>> > firewall.
>> >
>> > Can I do this in pfsense ???
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Jeronimo L. Cabral
>> > <jelocab...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> OK Ivo, this is very helpful to me....Suppose I have:
>> >>
>> >> Router / IP 200.1.1.1 --- WAN/pFsense/LAN --- Firewall / IP 200.1.1.2
>> >>
>> >> I have to maintan invariable the addressing of this scenario, so what
>> >> IP
>> >> addresses do I have to assign to WAN and LAN pFsense interfaces ???
>> >>
>> >> Thanks a lot,
>> >>
>> >> JeLo
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Ivo Tonev <i...@tonev.pro.br> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> In production environment you need 3 interfaces - one for WAN, one for
>> >>> LAN and one for management.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/quick_start/ips/ips_qsg.html
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:24 PM, compdoc <comp...@hotrodpc.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> > But you say: one interface for WAN, a second for
>> >>>>
>> >>>> >LAN...and which interface is for managing ???
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You manage with a browser from LAN, and optional also from the WAN
>> >>>> port.
>> >>>> And with ssh from the LAN.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> List mailing list
>> >>>> List@lists.pfsense.org
>> >>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Ivo R. Tonev
>> >>> +55 61 8409-2642
>> >>> i...@tonev.com.br
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> List mailing list
>> >>> List@lists.pfsense.org
>> >>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > List mailing list
>> > List@lists.pfsense.org
>> > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>> _______________________________________________
>> List mailing list
>> List@lists.pfsense.org
>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ivo R. Tonev
> +55 61 8409-2642
> i...@tonev.com.br
>
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> List@lists.pfsense.org
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to