Shouldn't the EdgeRouter lite support pfsense with the 2.2 release?
Your own post:
"When what I'm trying to do is make pfSense available on an inexpensive
platform. It should perform better than an Alix, even without the
private-SDK stunts.
Jim"
from: http://lists.pfsense.org/pipermail/dev/2013-November/000448.html
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 10/24/2014 10:14 AM, Jim Thompson wrote:
This list is not about Ubiquiti. (At least not until we make pfSense
available on Ubiquiti platforms.)
Please take the discussion elsewhere.
jim
On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com
<mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>> wrote:
I am the CIO of a WISP who uses their products, and does a lot of
alpha/beta testing for them and other vendors... I may be a little
biased.
The M series gear is pretty good kit for point to point or point to
multi point applications. AirFiber is great for ~10 mile or less
shots, with bandwidth a little over 765Mbps full duplex on short
range shots with the AF24. The new UniFi products are looking good,
basically localor remote "cloud" managed routers, switches, access
points, and phones, with plans to fold the unifi-video line directly
in, as well as the mFi sensor line into the same interface. The
camera hardware is getting better, but the native camera feature set
needs work... I can't seem to get it pounded into peoples heads that
RTSP and cookieless jpg snapshots should be native on the cameras
themselves.
1M pps routing for $99 on an edgerouter-lite ain't a bad gig. I'd
still like to see more work done on the HA front- I need more than
VRRP. The QoS engine and firewall engines could both stand to be
rebuilt, and might be in the fairly near future. The standard 8 port
edgerouter and edgerouter pro models are pretty nice. I'm excited to
see how the "carrier" and other future models turn out.
There-- that's a quick writeup that should be useful for people on
this list.
Did Thompson molt yet?
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com/>
On 10/24/2014 05:53 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
I presume UBNT is Ubiquiti?
I'm probably going to start testing their hardware for other
applications (I work in the video surveillance industry as well as
high capacity wifi) and I'd be curious to get some pros/cons from
those who know... so please email me off list (so as not to offend
the other Thompson on the list... he might molt on me anyway).
Sliante!
On 10/24/2014 4:03 AM, Adam Thompson wrote:
[One public correction, nothing to do with Godwin's law! -Adam]
On 14-10-23 08:36 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
Not that UBNT is a paragon of openness, either,
“either”? Wow. Strike 2.
That wasn't a dig at you or ESF or NG - I was thinking of Brocade
when I wrote that. I could also use UBNT's competitor, MikroTik,
as a good example of how to build decent products the wrong way,
but Brocade was my target here. You're a paragon of open-source
stewardship in comparison!
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org <mailto:List@lists.pfsense.org>
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
