Yeah there’s a difference between the upgrade fails and the upgraded system 
just doesn’t work with limiters.

It seems either traffic just doesn’t flow or limiters don’t limit.

I am really looking forward to this being fixed. Until then, 2.1.5 rules the 
roost.

It’s a pretty sad state.

> On Dec 14, 2015, at 8:26 AM, Ryan Clough <ryan.clo...@dsic.com> wrote:
> 
> Might also depend on how the limiters are being used and how the rest of
> the router is configured. I have been up against this bug for at least six
> months:
> https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4326
> 
> ___________________________________________
> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> Ryan Clough
> Information Systems
> Decision Sciences International Corporation
> <http://www.decisionsciencescorp.com/>
> <http://www.decisionsciencescorp.com/>
> 
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 5:29 PM, ED Fochler <soek...@liquidbinary.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Limiters work on 2.2.4, I’m using them.  But I didn’t upgrade, I created
>> the limiters on 2.2.4.  Are you asking if limiters work?  Or are you just
>> noting that they don’t cleanly upgrade?  If you create them through the GUI
>> and link them in with the firewall rules, do they work now?
>> 
>>        ED.
>> 
>>> On 2015, Dec 12, at 1:43 PM, Ugo Bellavance <u...@lubik.ca> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> We upgraded from 2.0.1-RELEASE to 2.2.4-RELEASE and the limiter that
>> worked on 2.0.1 stopped working.  This limiter (and sub-limiters) is
>> located on an inside interface and its role is to limit the traffic that
>> can come in.  This firewall is at a remote site and we replicate backups
>> there.  We use this limiter because the bandwidth at the remote site is
>> higher than at our main site.  Using this limiter avoids saturating our
>> main site's WAN link and cause slowdowns.
>>> 
>>> Looking at the config diffs, it looks like the <dnpipe> tags have
>> changed during the upgrade.  It looked like ?1 and ?2 and now it looks like
>> labels.  Also, the <bandwidth> tag seem to include more stuff now.
>>> 
>>> It was <bandwidth>28</bandwidth> and now it looks like
>>>                      <bandwidth>
>>>                              <item>
>>>                                      <bw>28</bw>
>>>                                      <bwscale>Mb</bwscale>
>>>                                      <bwsched>none</bwsched>
>>>                              </item>
>>>                      </bandwidth>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Ugo
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pfSense mailing list
>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pfSense mailing list
>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>> 
> 
> -- 
> This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email 
> or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please report 
> the error to the sender by return email and delete this communication from 
> your records.
> _______________________________________________
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to