On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Karl Fife <karlf...@gmail.com> wrote: > We've entered the wonderful world of the traffic limiters. Specifically, we > put FACEBOOK subnets through a comparatively skinny pipe. This is done to > make it JUST a bit too painful to look at kitten photos, but perfectly > suitable to look at CompetitorCo's facebook page for legitimate business > purposes. We're still collecting empirical data on how much it disuades > personal use, but it doesn't seem to create tension the way that explicit > blocking would. > > The issue: > > in <=2.2 if an in-use limiter is renamed, the system will yell at you. IMO, > that's good. >
That's not true actually. No input_errors there when renaming a limiter. You can't delete one that's in use. 2.3 is the same in that regard. There is a bug ticket open on updating firewall rules when a limiter is renamed (or preventing renaming) to avoid removal of limiters from rules when renamed. That's no diff than it's ever been though. _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
