Are your rules disappearing on the slave, the master, or both? Brainstorming, do both have the same name for the pfsync interface? Meaning the slave isn't named PFSYNC-SLAVE or something like that?
-- Steve Yates ITS, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Luc Paulin Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 9:10 AM To: list@lists.pfsense.org Subject: [pfSense] pfsense in ha - sync interface rule disapear Hi Everyone, I am new to pfsense and I have to say to that I am very impressed to see all the feature available out of box. I am currently testing it to see how well it work and perform for our environement. We would like to replace our HA linux firewall running IPTable/fwbuiler scripts. Currently trying to setup the HA but having hard time to make it work properly. I am following the wiki guide ( https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Configuring_pfSense_Hardware_Redundancy_(CARP) ). The issue that I have is that the rule I added on both firewall to allow SYNC interface to communicate keep disapear on the slave firewall once the connection got established. So XMLRPC did copy rules from master to slave, but the PFSYNC interface rules disapear, therefore this cause communication issue after (/rc.filter_synchronize: New alert found: A communications error occurred while attempting XMLRPC sync with username admin https://172.16.199.2:443.) _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
