Yes

Am 16.11.2016 19:31 schrieb "Eero Volotinen" <eero.voloti...@iki.fi>:

> I think it is possible to use lagg interface for workaround with interface
> naming?
>
> Eero
>
> 2016-11-16 7:14 GMT+02:00 Chris L <c...@viptalk.net>:
>
> > > On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:50 PM, Eero Volotinen <eero.voloti...@iki.fi>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > same ports? you mean that same port assigment and nic can be different
> > type?
> > >
> > > eero
> >
> > No.
> >
> > Hardware should be as identical as possible. 100% identical is best. If
> > LAN is em0 on one side, it must be em0 on the other.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > 15.11.2016 11.36 ip. "Steve Yates" <st...@teamits.com> kirjoitti:
> > >
> > >>        Any hardware should work fine.  They recommend a separate
> > NIC/port
> > >> for the sync traffic since if syncing states there can be a lot of
> > traffic
> > >> (if not syncing state there is probably very little).  I don't think
> it
> > >> needs to be identical hardware but the rules would need to copy over
> so
> > it
> > >> would need the same ports.
> > >>
> > >>        One gotcha that caught me...under "System/High Availability
> > >> Sync/Configuration Synchronization Settings (XMLRPC Sync)" there is a
> > >> "Remote System Username" field.  That field is ignored, and "admin" is
> > >> always used.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Steve Yates
> > >> ITS, Inc.
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Eero
> > >> Volotinen
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:20 PM
> > >> To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <
> list@lists.pfsense.org
> > >
> > >> Subject: [pfSense] pfsense + carp + ha
> > >>
> > >> Hi List,
> > >>
> > >> What are requirements for pfsense ha clustering? does any of x86
> > hardware
> > >> work with ha? does hardware need to be identical?
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> pfSense mailing list
> > >> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> > >> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pfSense mailing list
> > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> > > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pfSense mailing list
> > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> >
> _______________________________________________
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to