Hi Robert
Almost there, you're just using square brackets"[" instead of parens "("
test: "Hi"
== "Hi"
>> bla: "There"
== "There"
>> compose [(test) (bla) bla (test)]
== ["Hi" "There" bla "Hi"]
Without deep
compose [(test) [(bla)] (bla) bla (test)]
== ["Hi" [(bla)] "There" bla "Hi"]
With deep
>> compose/deep [(test) [(bla)] (bla) bla (test)]
== ["Hi" ["There"] "There" bla "Hi"]
>>
Cheers,
Allen K
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 1999 12:37 AM
Subject: [REBOL] compose??
> Hi, just playing around with 'compose. I thought it would be a cool thing
> to use, to flatten nested blocks into one level. So I tried:
>
> >> help compose
> Selectively evaluates a block of expressions, only evaluating paren
> expressions and returns the result as a block.
> Arguments:
> value -- Block to compose
> Refinements:
> /deep -- Compose within nested blocks
> >> compose [[test bla] bla [test]]
> == [[test bla] bla [test]]
> >> compose/deep [[test bla] bla [test]]
> == [[test bla] bla [test]]
> >>
>
> ?? For the last I would have expected: [test bla bla test]
>
> So what's the difference with /deep?
>
> Robert M. Muench, Karlsruhe, Germany
> ==> ask for PGP public-key <==
>
> When do you want to reboot today?
>
> Use the free portable GUI Library
> OpenAmulet from http://www.openip.org
>
>
