|
Perhaps this will make more sense to you:
>> a: 0 == 0 >> b: to-set-word 'a == a: >> ; Note the ":" >> b 1 == 1 >> a == 1 On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:39:51 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi Anton, > >Hmmm. So why doesn't: > > to-set-word b 1 > >work then? What is the difference when you assign "to-set-word b" to another >word (c) and then use c? Why does your method work whereas mine doesn't? > >> > Passing by reference >> >> > a: 0 ; >> 0 >> > b: 'a ; >> a >> > to-set-word b ; >> a: >> > to-set-word b 1 ; >> 1 >> > a ; >> 0 >> > >> > so what is the point of to-set-word if I can then not use it to set the >> > thing? Do I need an extra block and a "do" or something like that? >> >> c: to-set-word b >> c 1 >> a ; >> 1 >> >> Regards >> -- >> >> Anton >> |
|
Chris Mahnken [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
