Ah, but see, if the API docs were released / reviewed / evolved with comments
from the developer community prior to release of the implementation, then even
this approach could work;  an open source / non-Command implementation could
conform to the same API as it evolves.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I'll just jump in with my big two feet.
>     A C++ program that can read or write a TCP port from/to REBOL/Core will
> be valuable for those people, like students, educational institutions and so
> on, that won't be able to afford REBOL/Command (of course, if it's free,
> that invalidates my argument).
>     So, even if the program is invalidated by REBOL/Command, it'll still be
> worthwhile, for the above users.
>
> Andrew Martin
> Putting on clodhoppers...
> ICQ: 26227169
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
> -><-

Reply via email to