Hi Gabriele,
I'm using direct right now, I have checked pass-through, too,
but wasn't able to resolve this way ...
Everything else works fine, but having a read that can't
return a value, isn't optimal, I think ;-)
thanks,
Ingo
Those were the words of [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > my problem: within a protocols read function I have to close
> > the original port, so that the server reads the data I sent.
> > (I tried write-io, but it didn't work.) Naturally, I get an
> > hour, when the port is to be closed by the protocol ...
>
> Are you using a direct or pass-thru scheme?
>
> Ciao,
> /Gabriele./
-- _ . _
ingo@)|_ /| _| _ <We ARE all ONE www._|_o _ _ ._ _
www./_|_) |o(_|(/_ We ARE all FREE> ingo@| |(_|o(_)| (_|
http://www.2b1.de/Rebol/ ._| ._|
