[REBOL] Return types Re:(4)

[dankelg8]

On Wed, 5 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi Gisle,
> 
> you wrote:
> 
> >Elan's idea of being able to optionally specify return types of a
> >function would be nice 
> 
> Thank you. I think this email contains a rather complete return type
> enforcer function (further below).

Thank you ! This will be useful! I didn't think of looking at it from that
perspective. It'll do the job pretty well :)

Gisle