Hi , 7-Aug-2000 you wrote:


>> Hi Hen, 6-Aug-2000 you wrote:
>>
>> >Are there any plans to create a Rebol implementation for the Java machine?
>>

>Answer was finished, then i read again: Oops. a Rebol
>implementation for the Java machine" or " a Java implementation
>for the Rebol machine" ? i answer to the first below
>(bytecode-rebol), but you seem to answer the second?

Yeah, it seems like I read "of" instead of "for" in the original question ;-)

But replying to the real question, then: This would force REBOL Tech. to
rewrite the REBOL interpreter in JAVA, and I sincerely doubt that they have
resources (employees, time, etc.) for that.

Besides, do any platforms exist for which there is a JVM but no REBOL
interpreter? I cannot think of any (perhaps the forthcoming MAJC-based
systems, but I don't know the timeline for those), and if there aren't any
such platforms, nobody would gain anything from a JAVA implementation of
REBOL.

Just my thoughts...

Kind regards,
--
Ole Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Amiga is a trademark of Amiga Inc.

Reply via email to