> how about? > 1to10 > -1to-10 > .1to.10 > > Is using n"to"n that different from using n"x"n for pairs? It is immediately > obvious that it is a range, ( in English at least). > > Other ideas? "to" could be exclusive and "thru" inclusive like parse. Don't know what you do about the range start though. ".." is quite concise (if barely legible on my monitor ;) ). So if we were lucky enough to get some range math use a .. b for an inclusive range as suggested before. a <.. b for an exclusive start point and inclusive end point a ..> b you can guess a <..> b a range that does not include the end points Brett.
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(8) Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(9) Petr . Krenzelok
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(10... carlos
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(7) Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(8) jpt
- [REBOL] Re: Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re... alex . pini
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(6) Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(7) ptretter
- [REBOL] Re: Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re... alex . pini
- [REBOL] Re: Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re... alex . pini
- [REBOL] Re: Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re... bhandley
- [REBOL] Re: Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(3) g . santilli