[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there!
> I am most definitely interested in this, and think it is worth
> continued effort; Particularly with the new multiplexing possibilities in
> the experimental versions. I have a project or two that would be greatly
> benefited. I would be willing to test web2, although I am not a TCP
> expert. Drop me a line. (and a copy!)
Very good example of holding pairs of multiple connections is imho Sterling's
web-proxy.r scrip you can find on www.rebol.org ....
Cheers,
-pekr-
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
>
>
> Dameron
>
> on Tue, Aug 29, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something like:
>
> >Hello REBOL's,
> >
> > I have been working with the script %webserver.r alot lately...
> > I have noticed it has bugs (one of which being _dont_ use IE).
> >
> > I have constructed from Webserver.r , a revised version which i call
> >Web2.
> > Web2 has plugin modules, module registration, custom cgi calls (i call
> >them @jscall's),
> > A Web Message Interface (not finished) , Basic ip adddress
> >authentication,
> > Session Variable creation and a few more features i am adding now.
> >
> > I have some things to question now, 1. is it worth the continued effort
> >?
> > 2. if so i
> >will release a base version in about 2 weeks
> > 3. is
> >anyone interested in this?
> >
> > If you would like to help me email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > If you are interested in this project and using the web2 for
> >development, post a message
> > expressing so in the rebol list.
> >
> >Aden.
> >
> >
> >
