IIRC, that was a version of SELMA, but then RT did some maintenance work
on the script en dumped full names?
Rachid
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 01:03
Subject: [REBOL] Re: full names in sender
>
> > > You'll recall that before SELMA took over the list, there *were*
full
> > > names in the header. Ingo and I discussed the "problem" and even
had
> > > some solutions; none of mine ever got worked through enough to
submit
> > > to RT for inclusion in Selma (or REBOL itself).
> > <...>
> >
> > Hi Kev,
> >
> > my version works for me and got sent to feedback (final version was
> > #1467 22/Nov/1999, I think), after that I never heard about it.
> >
> > Same for help working on path values (#2729 12/Apr/2000).
> >
> > So I now just enjoy my working system,
>
> Hey Ingo!
>
> Could you send me your version? I've been thinking about working it
> into SELMA and sending the patch into RT -- since they asked if
> anybody had SELMA patches to contribute. I'd sure like to get real
> names back into the mix, and *somebody* needs to do it! ;-)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Kev
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Kevin McKinnon, System/Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sunshine Communications
http://www.sunshinecable.com
>
> PGP Public Key: http://www.dockmaster.net/pgp.html PGP 6.0
www.pgp.com
>
>
