>Oracle accounts are the most likely to have a generous budget ... ? ;-) What does that mean? I don't see how that answers my question. Please restate. Thanks At 11:11 PM 9/27/2000 -0700, you wrote: >Hi Jeff, > >Oracle accounts are the most likely to have a generous budget ... ? ;-) > >----- Original Message ----- >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 10:43 PM >Subject: [REBOL] Rebol/Command Linux and Oracle? > > > > According to the matrix (not the movie) on the Rebol site regarding >Command. > > > > It would appear that Command only supports usage of Oracle DB on Linux. > > > > Is that true? If so, why? Oracle is the most expensive damn thing out > > there for production environments and that sorta kills the price point of > > Command. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jeff > > > > > > >> ;- Elan [ : - ) ] >visit my Website http://www.TechScribe.com >author of REBOL: THE OFFICIAL GUIDE >REBOL Press: The Official Source for REBOL Books >http://www.REBOLpress.com > >----- Original Message ----- >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 10:43 PM >Subject: [REBOL] Rebol/Command Linux and Oracle? > > > > According to the matrix (not the movie) on the Rebol site regarding >Command. > > > > It would appear that Command only supports usage of Oracle DB on Linux. > > > > Is that true? If so, why? Oracle is the most expensive damn thing out > > there for production environments and that sorta kills the price point of > > Command. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jeff > > > >
