Re: [TB-303.org] Does your 303 experience the same trait as mine?

[David Joeright]

Never-the-less,  If Jaybird spent $35,000 (U.S. Philadelphian dollars) on his equipment... Then your music should have a more professional sound, [even on the web..].  I'm sorry,,, No insult intended Jaybird....You've got some sweet tracks......   ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 9:34 PM Subject: Re: [TB-303.org] Does your 303 experience the same trait as mine? In a message dated 18/05/2002 02:06:47 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Kill the samplers..  Why sample when you can use the real thing. Samplers are only for Vocals! the 303 doesn't have the computational power and "cleanliness" of a sampler. we're not neglecting the 303 ..it just hangs back and chills out whilst ... we use its armada of real genuine pure 303 patterns with additonal equipment The dist, noise gate, sampler, mixer does all the donkey work! And hopefully new sounds will evolve than from using just 303 and 909 and mixing equipment. A friend of mine who works in a studio said he used a mcp4000 on a 808 and 909 bass drum and he said it sounded better than any loop cd of retro equipment he's ever bought. If it kills writers block and excels creativty..then using  new digital equipement along with old analgue stuff must be a good thing. I'm sure all those songs u hear on the "Dance" charts nowadays don't use real authentic gear and standard "vanilla flavoured" 80's dance equipment ... infact  im sure Jomox's are more prevalent than 909's. cya, shaz