Thanks,
We share similar reservations. Is the following a more usable solution?
<dd class="email"><a
href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Chuck at tacticalware.net</a></dd>
<dd class="email"><a
href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Ramblin at tacticalware.net</
a></dd>
Or should the mailto: go altogether?
On Mar 29, 2006, at 5:39 PM, Christian Montoya wrote:
On 3/29/06, CK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The following pages are up for review:
...
(http://working.bushidodeep.com/tacticalware/contact.html)
...
Any insight is appreciated.
Maybe you are planning to change it, but I'll mention that contact
forms are much better than mailto: links, and even just plain text
e-mail addresses are better to. mailto: links are very annoying for us
web-based-e-mail users.
--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
