So, apart from saving 2 bytes on transfer, there's no really technical
reason why one is better?
Cool :o)
Just thought I'd get that checked by my technically-minded peers! :o)
R
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lachlan Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <wsg@webstandardsgroup.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Single or Double Quotes
Richard Czeiger wrote:
What's the consensus on this one?
Should you use single or double quotes for background images in your CSS?
background-image: url('image.jpg'); or background-image:
url("image.jpg");
C) None of the above.
background-image: url(image.jpg);
And here's the real question: why?
Because it's 2 characters you don't need in most cases and nicely side
steps this whole issue of single vs double quotes. Whatever you choose,
it's really just a matter of personal preference, but you should be
consistent.
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
