Sorry, I should have phrased that better. I meant if you're going to have captions, wouldn't one of the reasons be for screen readers?
On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:09:03 +0100, "Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jake Badger wrote: >> Don't tables need captions for screen readers? > > Not necessarily. It's not an either/or situation. Even without a > caption, a table can be perfectly accessible and fine for screen reader > users (for instance, if there was enough information preceding the > table, such as an introductory paragraph that is visible to *everybody*, > or a heading, etc). > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > __________________________________________________________ > re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively > [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] > www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk > http://redux.deviantart.com > __________________________________________________________ > Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force > http://webstandards.org/ > __________________________________________________________ > > > ****************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ****************************************************** ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
