On Aug 11, 2006, at 5:55 AM, Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
Two different meanings of the word "Ruby": "its clients' sites are
developed in Ruby" is the case of the Ruby programming language
[1]. "It also adds a number of elements for Ruby annotations" is
the case of special characters use to annotate ideographic
languages [2].
[1] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_programming_language>
[2] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_character>
I think it's [1]. They use Ruby on rail and I was once asked if I
know rhtml.
It sounds like they don't actually understand what XHTML is or how
to produce it, they just want to believe they're using the latest
cool thing.
I really don't know enough to response to the above comment. Let
along the xhtml thing, they do some great stuff.
I think the problem maybe that, they hired people like me and many
others for css coding and design templates, and everyone's skill
varies, some don't have the concept of sematic markup, some maybe
depend on Dreamweaver or Golive and never work on code view and never
learn or never care validation is important; some maybe at the very
beginning of CSS. And the boss is just too busy dealing with client
and bring in more clients so that I can pay rent :)
tee
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
