Just by way of clarification, when I said "it _looks_ bad" I wasn't referring to the visual aspect of the design, but rather the execution.
Cheers
Steve
On 06/10/06, Nick Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, I wouldn't even say it "looks bad" as visually it's much better
than a lot of sites (aside from little things like overly faint and/
or small text). With that in mind the only way to really say it is
bad design is if it is inappropriate to it's requirements... which we
don't know.
----------------------------------------------
Steve 'Doc' Baty B.Sc (Maths), M.EC , MBA
Director, User Experience Strategy
Red Square
P: +612 8289 4930
M: +61 417 061 292
Member, UPA - www.upassoc.org
Member, IxDA - www.ixda.org
Member, Web Standards Group - www.webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
