On 10/25/06, Thierry Koblentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hassan Schroeder wrote:
> Thierry Koblentz wrote:
>> It was about using SS-I *without* server-side scripting.
> which was exactly my point -- vanilla SSI meets the requirement :-)
And it's a very good point ;-)
I always thought the echo directive didn't work in shtml pages (only
"include"), but it *does*.
I guess this is one more reason to never use "htm" or "html", but at least
"shtml". No?
What would be the reason for choosing "htm" or "html" for file extension?
Youthful ignorance?
--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ... portfolio.christianmontoya.com
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
