Why would you not just use conditional stylesheets? They're well supported
and mean that your core css will validate perfectly.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Pierre-Henri Lavigne
> Sent: 10 February 2007 17:20
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: [WSG] "Avoid non valid css hacks"
> 
> Ok at my work I joined last october they used to work with ie 
> hacks such as _
> 
> In their specifications, they are releasing only valid html 
> code and not css, and I am trying to release valid css 
> stylesheets too, (Boum) I still used tantek hack for example 
> with voice-family. And for various reasons, they don't like 
> it. For maintaining they don't want to use ie conditional 
> stylesheets for example and want everything in one stylesheet.
> 
> So everyone think about it, decided to upgrade it 
> progressivly to try finding new stuffs.
> 
> First initiative came from a colleague who suggest for width 
> and height properties :
> width: 980px !important; /* standard loving browser */
> width: 952px; /* IE5 */
> width /**/ : /**/ 962px; /* IE6 */
> 
> What do you think about it ? Is it a method already used on the web ?
> 
> My other question is different and was about the selector >. 
> I am using 
> html>body #container for example.
> On the source from webstandardsawards.com they are using 
> body>#container.
> I suppose it is ok 'cause IE 6 won't understand it, but was 
> it tested in depth ?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Wcube . eQuesto
> Pierre-Henri LAVIGNE
> Web developer xhtml - css
> 33, rue des Jeûneurs - FR 75002 Paris
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Phone: +33(0)1 42 47 83 83
> www.wcube.fr / www.equesto.fr
> 
> 
> 
> *******************************************************************
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *******************************************************************
> 



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to