Yep, Procmon was the first thing we did to troubleshoot. They found nothing in 
the almost 10,000,000 lines. We have done Wireshark, Procmon, their own 
internal code tracing stuff, sent them every log file, trace file, dmp file and 
anything else I or they could think of.

[I have no idea what I am saying in this next sentence] This vendor has changed 
the management framework their software runs under that allowed them to change 
their API and SDK so they can produce a “real” PowerShell implementation. They 
really want me to test their new PoSH stuff. For some strange reason they 
really want me to bless their new PoSH stuff. They also want me to have a 
documentation script ready for this new product when it is officially released 
using their new PoSH. Since I can’t get the product to run, I can’t test the 
new PoSH stuff.

The vendor has assigned three devs to work with me to get this issue resolved. 
So I am really REALLY hoping it is not something in my AD that is messing 
things up. They are spending a lot of resources to get this found and fixed and 
I just hope the problem isn’t on my end.

Thanks


Webster

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Ed Ziots
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: trying to find a thread about missing account(s) on 
drive/folder ACE


Also.turn on file auditing when running.the application and look at its 
processing via procmon

This should help.debug.where the issue is if its a file permission problem

Ed
On Apr 23, 2015 9:19 AM, "Webster" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yes, the PoSH session was elevated. Icacls is also being run from an elevated 
command prompt.

c:\>icacls.exe c:\
c:\ NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(OI)(CI)(F)
    BUILTIN\Administrators:(OI)(CI)(F)
    BUILTIN\Users:(OI)(CI)(RX)
    BUILTIN\Users:(CI)(S,AD)
    BUILTIN\Users:(CI)(IO)(S,WD)
    CREATOR OWNER:(OI)(CI)(IO)(F)

Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files

c:\>

I could not get the Get-GPOReport to work so I just went into GPMC and did a 
backup of all GPOs into that folder and that worked.

I am working with a vendor on a new version of one of their products. We can 
get the current version of their product to work fine in my lab but the new 
version refuses to run. It will install and let me configure it but the product 
refuses to run. The vendor wants to recreate my lab as close as they can so 
they wanted the GPO Reports. Guess they will have to work with the backup 
instead. Of course I use a PoSH script to create my lab’s AD structure and I 
sent them that script.

I am just hoping I don’t have an intrinsic issue with my lab’s AD that is 
causing issues with this vendor’s software. When I attempted to see if I could 
recreate the issue with their new product on Server 2008 R2, GPResult reported 
an unknown SID for the 2008 R2 server of S-1-18-1. I found the hotfix for that, 
applied it to the 2008 R2 server but it made no difference in being able to run 
the new software.

The vendor is unable to repro the issue in their lab but it is 100% 
reproducible in mine. I am running all 2012 R2 servers, FFL is 2012 R2 and I am 
also using SQL 2014 (no SP1, stand-alone SQL server, no HA).

Thanks


Webster

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:04 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: trying to find a thread about missing account(s) on 
drive/folder ACE

Notice those are all inherited rights.

Notice also that UAC comes into play.

Is your PowerShell session elevated?

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Webster
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:53 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: trying to find a thread about missing account(s) on 
drive/folder ACE

c:\>icacls.exe c:\gporeports
c:\gporeports CREATOR OWNER:(OI)(CI)(IO)(F)
              LabADDomain\ctxadmin:(OI)(CI)(F)
              BUILTIN\Users:(OI)(CI)(F)
              NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(I)(OI)(CI)(F)
              BUILTIN\Administrators:(I)(OI)(CI)(F)
              BUILTIN\Users:(I)(OI)(CI)(RX)
              BUILTIN\Users:(I)(CI)(S,AD)
              BUILTIN\Users:(I)(CI)(S,WD)
              LabADDomain\ctxadmin:(I)(F)
              CREATOR OWNER:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(F)

Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files

But:

Windows PowerShell
Copyright (C) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

PS C:\Windows\system32> get-gporeport -All -ReportType HTML -Path c:\GPOReports
get-gporeport : Access to the path 'c:\GPOReports' is denied.
At line:1 char:1
+ get-gporeport -All -ReportType HTML -Path c:\GPOReports
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    + CategoryInfo          : NotSpecified: (:) [Get-GPOReport], 
UnauthorizedAccessException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : 
System.UnauthorizedAccessException,Microsoft.GroupPolicy.Commands.GetGpoReportCommand

PS C:\Windows\system32>

Thanks


Webster

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:49 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: trying to find a thread about missing account(s) on 
drive/folder ACE

What does icacls.exe say about the folder?

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Webster
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:44 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [NTSysADM] trying to find a thread about missing account(s) on 
drive/folder ACE

I have run into an issue in my lab where I can create a folder but cannot 
create any files in the folder after the folder is created. I thought I 
remembered a thread on this list earlier this year about a similar issue and it 
was a missing account that needed to be added back. I can’t find that thread.

My lab is 2 2012R2 DCs and FFL of 2012 R2. All my servers are 2012 R2.

Thanks


Webster

Reply via email to