Thanks guys,

 

You played a bit more? :)

 

I use prestage for remote sites, so most content would be available.

Once in the OS BC is enabled which would handle most other content.

 

What’s missing is boot images, although only downloaded once, it’s still a
lot over the WAN (I haven’t had time to do your BC in PE thing).

Wondering if using PE peer cache would be worth the trouble

 

-R

 

 

Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Im Auftrag von Phil Wilcock
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 12:23
An: [email protected]
Betreff: RE: [mssms] Windows PE peer cache

 

Yeah PeerCache is OK, bit of a ‘stopgap’ solution IMO – but does the job if
you can’t run BranchCache.

 

Also bear in mind that Apps and Software Updates always come from the DP so
you’d still need BranchCache for them anyways

 

Few more caveats, hoping to play with it a bit more later today and will
report back!

 

Phil

 

 

Phil Wilcock

2Pint Software

http://2pintsoftware.com

@2pintsoftware

 

 

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: 09 December 2015 09:09
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: [mssms] Windows PE peer cache

 

Well… without trying to piss on someone else’s parade… the best quote we got
was from someone senior within MS:  “BranchCache with your (2Pint
Software’s) add-ons is a Formula 1 car, we are building a moped”

 

That said, it will fit the bill and help for companies that cannot use
BranchCache for whatever reason. Although I still don’t really see a single
reason not to use BranchCache. Phil is working on a detailed comparison but
here are a few items:

 

1.       Uses Packages from CCM Cache of other machines, so needs to be
package with right version and fully downloaded.

2.       Only for WinPE initiated content at the moment.

3.       If source is not available (see point 1) it goes over the WAN at
full throttle.

4.       There is no de-duplication…

 

So new image and you got to DL the whole thing over the wire again…
meanwhile BC works on chunks. So can use the old image and/or deploy loads
simultaneous machines and they will all share content among the active
peers.

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: den 8 december 2015 23:27
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [mssms] Windows PE peer cache

 

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/mt613173.aspx

 

Phil and Andreas should be interested in that subject :)

 

Any comments?

 

-R

 

 

 

 




Reply via email to