LOL That will work, especially since most of the developers will stop developing. :)
*ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker> *Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for the SMB market…* * GPG: *1AF3 EEC3 7C3C E88E B0EF 4319 8F28 A483 A182 EF3A On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Webster <[email protected]> wrote: > COBOL on punch cards? J > > > > > > Old Fart Webster > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Andrew S. Baker > *Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2015 11:03 AM > *Subject:* [NTSysADM] Protecting Sensitive Source Code > > > > Good morning: > > > > Does anyone happen to have any experience with the protection of sensitive > source code? > > > > Essentially, we're looking to ensure that we can adequately mitigate the > risk of critical portions of the code being copied and used inappropriately. > > > > This is beyond any protections (real or imagined) offered by the > following, which we have in place today: > > > > -- An NDA > > -- Restricted access to the source code repository, on a need to know basis > > -- Two-factor authentication to access the repository (being considered) > > > > An air-gapped network is not currently on the table for discussion. :) > > > > Regards, > > > > > *ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker> > *Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for > the SMB market…* > > * GPG: *1AF3 EEC3 7C3C E88E B0EF 4319 8F28 A483 A182 EF3A >
