On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Todd Lemmiksoo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Check AD for the cluster name.

There is a computer entry for the Windows cluster name, yes. There is
no entry (user or computer) for the removed SQL network name
"MultiSite1", no.

(we use a File Share Witness as a quorum, and the file share needs to
have the computer account of the Windows cluster in the security of
the share)

>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Michael Leone <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I have to set up a SQL 2012 MultiSubnet Cluster. My boss had set up a
>> testing version (meaning: he set up a 2 node Windows 2012 mutlisubnet
>> cluster, and then installed SQL 2012 Cluster on it); when he left the
>> company recently, we uninstalled SQL Cluster, but left the Windows
>> cluster intact (rather than rebuild everything from scratch).
>>
>> I am at the point of reinstalling SQL 2012, now for production, not
>> testing. Here's the thing - when I run the Windows cluster validation,
>> I am still seeing references to the OLD SQL network name
>> ("MultiSite1"). This cluster resource does not exist any longer.
>> Problem is, I don't see it in the Failover Cluster Manager anywhere. I
>> only see it in the Cluster Validation report, under various warnings:
>>
>> under "Validate Resource Status", it shows that "Validating cluster
>> resource Name: MultiSite1" shows as 'Failed'.
>>
>> under "Validate Multiple Subnet Properties", it says to change the
>> HostRecordTTL property for network name "MultiSite1".
>>
>> It is also showing up as Cluster Event errors - event ID 1051, cluster
>> network name resource cannot be brought online.
>>
>>
>> SO:
>>
>> How can I get rid of this now phantom resource "MultiSite1", before I
>> go an install SQL 2012 (with it's own new SQL Server Network Name)? It
>> should have been removed when I uninstalled the old SQL 2012 cluster,
>> but apparently it wasn't (or I did the uninstall wrong, I guess). I
>> don't see "MultiSite1" under any resource in Failover Cluster Manager.
>>
>> Hope I was clear enough on this.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> T. Todd Lemmiksoo


Reply via email to