Your LSP like SoftwareONE, SHI, etc can make a case for you along with the local Microsoft rep. I'm assuming there is a EA and if so you are assigned a local Microsoft rep.
Sent from a mobile device > On Feb 17, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Burke, John <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sounds all in good, but how do I make that case to the powers that be, so > that they see that? > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Juelich, Adam > Sent: February-17-16 1:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: SCCM and SA Agreements > > +1 > > What he said. > > Over the past few years Microsoft has changed several things with licensing > that has usually made it more affordable for companies to have an EA with SA. > You may be able to get this license based on FTE (Full Time Employee > Equivalent) and save quite a bit of money. > > I'd recommend working with a company that deals with licensing specifically > to help you get what you want at the best price. We work with SoftwareONE on > that..... > > > ----------------------------------------------- > > Adam Juelich > > Pulaski Community School District > > Client Management Specialist > > 920-822-6075 > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife > <[email protected]> wrote: > In my opinion, if you’re in a company of 30,000 clients, and you’re not in an > EA with SA, you’re just asking for trouble. > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Burke, John > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:10 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [mssms] SCCM and SA Agreements > > Hi folks, > > I’m here as part of a smaller company that just got eaten up by a large > company that doesn’t have an SA with Microsoft thus, can’t upgrade to 2012 > without significant cost. > > I’m wondering how many on this list don’t have enterprise agreements? > > I’m also wondering why they are so against an SA because of cost. Are they > that expensive to get for say 30000 system/ users and isn’t it offset by the > tools you automatically get access to via MDOP and so on? > > Any input would be appreciated. I’d love to be able to get back to point that > all the sub companies and domains could all get on the same Tech for imaging, > software deployment and so on. > > > > > The Pulaski Community School District does not discriminate on the basis of > any characteristic protected under State or Federal law. > >
