I'm curious if anyone has found any unintended consequences of having always connected laptops? I'm just imagining someone lends their work laptop to their little kid to watch a movie and then a network drive goes missing. I haven't researched DirectAccess a lot, so maybe that's not possible?
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Melvin Backus Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 8:11 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] DirectAccess I'm very interested in responses to this as well. I'm considering a project to implement this. I have a few additional questions if I may. Are your client machines running Win7 or Win8.x? If you are only running 8.x, did you have / create a CA in place or use the Kerberos proxy functionality? For any of you who looked at this and decided not to do it and went another way, why and what solution did you pick instead? -- There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kish n Kepi Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 7:31 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [NTSysADM] DirectAccess I would like to hear from people who have implemented DirectAccess on Windows Server 2012 R2. 1. Did you do it yourself or hire a consultant 2. Was it difficult, or time-consuming to deploy the solution 3. To how many computers did you deploy 4. Does it work seamlessly as advertised 5. Is throughput same, faster or slower than conventional VPN? Any other questions I'm not knowledgeable enough to ask? Kish
