Editor:
     I submit this for a My Word guest editorial. Sentinel Automotive 
Editor Steven Cole Smith belittled me in a commentary, and has invited 
my reply. He will not correct his errors, so I will.
     Thank you.
                HEW
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GM Says Wait for Volt Batteries; Scientists, Top GM Engineer Says 
Batteries Ready Now

Hugh E Webber
Winter Park

     Orlando Sentinel Automotive Editor Steven Cole Smith recently 
wrote a commentary entitled: “Electric vibes for a car that can’t be 
built.” It appeared on the front of the Drive section on Saturday, 
January 20th, 2007. His commentary begins with a letter to the editor 
printed on Thursday, January 11th, asking why the Sentinel hadn't 
reported on General Motors's Chevrolet Volt concept car. The unveiling 
of GM’s electrically-driven Volt was hugely popular and widely 
reported in coverage of the recent Detroit auto show.
 
     Smith’s soon names me as the letter writer and contradicts my 
letter’s central point.  Smith denies that the debut of the Chevy Volt 
plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) concept car was news. To wit: 
sensational, revolutionary car = not news.

     Smith makes this curious claim because General Motors, at the 
debut of the Volt, declared that it required certain batteries to 
power a production model. Mass-producing its driveable concept PHEV, 
said GM, requires a “technological breakthrough” in making large 
lithium batteries. GM claims that it will take until 2010 or 2012 to 
build the Volt.

     Smith goes on to report that “some experts” claim that such 
batteries won’t be ready for three to five years. He continues by 
noting that “some other experts” predict that such technology may be 
ten or more years in the future. 

     Battery-industry journals reported this battery breakthrough 
(that GM awaits) in 2004.

     A week before Smith's commentary appeared, GM’s top automotive 
engineer was interviewed by MIT’s Tech Review, saying that Volt-ready 
batteries already exist. At least one maker’s highway-capable electric 
vehicle (EV) is powered by such lithium batteries. Please check my 
facts: EVWorld.com supplies links to this and other EV news.

     I wrote to the GM functionary who was responsible for the Volt 
press release; his reply yielded GM’s battery requirements. These can 
be met by existing, safe, large-format lithium batteries. The GM 
gentleman’s reply did not repeat GM's persistent statements that large-
format lithium batteries do not exist.

     Smith takes his “semi-breathless media colleagues” to task for 
doubting General Motors’ pronouncement that it cannot build a PHEV, 
though GM built EVs a decade ago. 

     Smith advises readers “not to get carried away by hyperbole.” He 
thereby belittles statements supported by Argonne National Laboratory 
and other respected scientific reports, that EVs can greatly reduce US 
air pollution and eliminate America’s addiction to Mid-east oil. 

     On the next page appears a photo of Michigan's Governor with the 
Volt. It bears a caption that denies the existence of batteries to 
power a production Volt. 

     Under the photo, Smith continues, mentioning GM’s sudden change 
of heart about EVs and last year’s well-received documentary film on 
GM’s crushing of its EV1s. Then he belittles any effect of EV 
activists' ten-year struggle: “Not so much…Ed Begley, Jr.-type 
environmentalists.” 

     Finally, Smith, unsurprisingly, repeats the corporate spin: “…
technology that, at present, does not exist, no matter how much we 
wish it did.”  

     GM’s statement contemporary with the Volt unveiling denies the 
existence of large-format lithium batteries once. Mr. Smith does it 
four times in his commentary, and repeatedly attacks me -and anyone 
else who thinks differently (or knows better.) 

     I don’t appreciate having my reputation wilfully damaged by 
Smith's commentary, which held me up by name for public ridicule. Mr. 
Smith has no evidence for his assertions but GM corporate spin. The 
statements in my letter are supported by documented studies. 

     Smith repeats GM’s unsupported claim that, absent suitable 
batteries, it cannot produce the Volt in less than three to five 
years. GM’s chief automotive engineer, on the other hand,  says that 
the required batteries are ready and only need to be integrated into a 
vehicle.    

     A week of correspondence between Mr. Smith and myself has not 
resulted in any promise of investigation by Sentinel reporters into 
the controversy surrounding GM’s only stated reason for delaying 
production of the Volt, a similar PHEV or another EV.

     Many people doubt General Motors' word regarding EVs. Why? A 
little history: 

     In 1990, GM debuted the Impact concept car (later renamed EV1) at 
a major auto show and promised to sell EVs to Americans. California’s 
Air Board later required them to do it.

     Starting in 1995, GM built a total of 1150 EV1s, which it refused 
to offer for sale: drivers could have EV1s only on closed-end leases. 
Having leased every EV1 that it had made available, GM began 
complaining that there was not enough demand for them. GM closed down 
EV1 production in 2000, stranding thousands on waiting lists.

In 2002, Chrysler, GM and some state GM dealers sued to void 
California’s mandate to mass-produce and sell EVs; when their cause 
succeeded, GM abandoned thousands of customers on EV1 waiting lists 
and refused lease renewals. Beginning in 2004, GM repossessed all 
lease-end EV1s and crushed virtually all of them.  

     In 2007, GM promises about the Volt come up short of the GM EV 
pledges in 1990. We in the EV activist community place little faith in 
the sudden conversion evidenced by recent GM talk about electric 
propulsion.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

     Hugh E Webber is past Secretary of the Florida chapter of the 
North American Electric Auto Association. He will continue to fact-
check and correct GM spin in media, demanding true vehicle choice for 
Americans, until the day that he can walk into a GM dealership and buy 
a highway-capable EV.

_______________________________________________________________________
Not for publication:

Hugh E Webber
1920 Azalea Ave.
Winter Park, FL 32792
407 673-4077

Breathe free,
                Hugh E Webber      
          Florida Electric Auto Association
Electric Vehicles: zero emissions and energy independence







_______________________________________________
FLEAA Mailing List
[email protected]
http://www.floridaeaa.org

Reply via email to