On 17/06/2012 22:57, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:

On 06/17/2012 10:21 PM, Micha Silver wrote:
On 06/17/2012 12:39 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:


Yes I believe this is a good suggestion.
I agree to have this mixture of compiled and pre-packaged binaries, it is better than having unstable or outdated non working versions.
But I have to ask:
Why is there a problem with dependencies in UbuntuGIS and we won't have the same when compiling the GUI part from source?


I also would like to better understand what the block is. Maybe this will throw some light on the issue:

http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.grass.pkg.devel/12677


Regards,
Angelos


-- 
Micha Silver
052-3665918

_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Reply via email to