Hamish,
Noted.
I've contacted all projects with a "critical" or "major" issue, and if
we can knock those issues off within a week, then I'd be ready to have a
conversation about moving our deadline forward.
I agree that compromising quality is not an option we want to consider,
and removing packages is something we should only consider as a last resort.
On 18/07/2012 8:40 PM, Hamish wrote:
Cameron wrote:
I'd like to float the idea of bringing our schedule forward
until we have a solid beta in our pocket I think it's a bit premature
to be proposing it too seriously. and before we all discuss it, it is
a bit premature to be broadcasting announcements beyond this list.
From my perspective we are not realistically ready for RC1 yet. I'm
all for the enthusiasm and seeing what we can get done in the near
future though and revisiting the idea next week after another beta or
two.
Angelos:
One thing I am not sure about is the availability of people
involved due to vacation time...
fwiw, I'll be away teaching a field course in a remote area with little
to no internet access for the first slice of August. And rather busy
work-wise up 'til then.
Cameron:
This will be a tight deadline, and might result in some applications
not being ready (and hence excluded).
that is not a compromise I believe we should make. half-baked is not
good enough.
best,
Hamish
--
Cameron Shorter
Geospatial Solutions Manager
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
http://www.lisasoft.com
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc