On 10/13/2013 10:49 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> I'll point out we're not a feature driven project, we are a scheduled
> delivery based project (A common debate, QGIS is considering schedules
> post 2.0). The clearly stated plan, we bundle what's available at each
> scheduled point in time for twice a year releases, once for Sept/Foss4g > and once for Feb/Mar conference season. We don't have enough testers at
> this time to do it more often. >

   +1

>> Such a release would require us checking/testing ALL applications, since
 > >> lots of things change in UbuntuGIS within a month...
  +1

I had a casual conversation with a developer this morning .. QGis 2.0 is a "dot-zero" release.. I am certain there will be a QGis 2.xx "bug fix" releases soon,
which will be better in other ways, too..
The OSGeo Live project will benefit from the next release *after* the "dot-zero" release
in addition to other considerations...
meanwhile, sophisticated users are *very much* enabled to create their own versions locally

--
Brian M Hamlin
OSGeo California Chapter

blog.light42.com



Actually version 2.0 was never released, it only reached to the packagers :) The released version was 2.0.1 since a sponsor logo was forgotten and had to be added after tagging 2.0.

Yes, we are expecting more bug-fixing point releases in the near future...

--
Angelos Tzotsos
Remote Sensing Laboratory
National Technical University of Athens
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc

Reply via email to