On 28/08/2016 11:12 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 08/27/16 22:41, Cameron Shorter wrote:
I like the GeoNode process for signing Contributor License Agreements,
and suggest that we should introduce something similar for OSGeo-Live
clahub.com <http://clahub.com>
I'd argue for dropping a CLA, it only raises the barrier to contribute
without much benefit for the project.
See also: http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2014/06/09/do-not-need-cla.html
I've recently retracted my pull requests to the protobuf project
because they require a CLA before considering the contributions. If
you require me to sign a legal document before accepting my patches, I
choose not to contribute to your project. The effort is simply not
worth it.
Kind Regards,
Bas
Thanks Bas for the URL. After reading it I agree that we don't want
contributors to sign a CLA, but rather have an "inbound=outbound"
process, where developers formally confirm they agree to the project's
Open Source license.
I'm hoping we can make our messy "confirm to an archived email list"
process cleaner by allowing contributors to use a web page instead,
which is linked to their git id, and can be used to ensure only
developers who have confirmed they agree with the license get their git
code merged.
Cheers, Cameron
--
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
Jirotech
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
P +61 2 8099 9000, M +61 419 142 254, W www.jirotech.com
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
