I am sure that the stream is an MPEG-4 ES via RTP. The manufacturer usually had a closed system, where they didn't test with other RTP clients for problems. They only checked the marker bit for the end of a frame and ensured that there were no sequence gaps/errors when reassembling frames. I am aware that this stream should be using payload type 96 with increasing timestamps. How reliable can I expect this algorithm to be for packet reassembly?
Thanks, Eric Flickner -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Finlayson Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 5:46 PM To: LIVE555 Streaming Media - development & use Subject: Re: [Live-devel] RTP Timestamps >1. Is it standards compliant for an RTP stream to contain all of >the same timestamp information for each RTP packet? No, because the timestamp represents the presentation time of each enclosed frame. >2. All of my packets have a payload type 88. Is there a specific >RFC that specifies the payload for this format? No. Are you *sure* that your stream is RTP? -- Ross Finlayson Live Networks, Inc. http://www.live555.com/ _______________________________________________ live-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel _______________________________________________ live-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
